PDA

View Full Version : Sony wtf


ZeroX
03-08-06, 16:18
Sony has a recent history of some really off the wall and offensive advertisements going, but I don't know if some of you have seen this one. I read about it on Joystiq thanks to a reader pointing it out:
http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/images/news/sony_ad.jpg


Now at first glance, this stands to be a pretty offensive advertisement. That was my first reaction, definitely. However it's important to keep in mind that this advertisement isn't running in the US. It's a campaign over in Europe (Holland, if I recall correctly?) only. Why is that? Maybe because here in America we have such a history of racial tension, a history of slavery, an issue that divided our country in two in the face of war. So maybe it seems like a pretty harsh image to us, because we're extra sensitive to that sort of thing, perhaps out of shame, due to that part of our nation's history. (I'm not saying racism doesn't exist elsewhere around the world, but I'm not from elsewhere around the world, so I can't vouch for the feelings of different cultures.)

But the advertisement wasn't meant for us (America). It's probably not a mistake that Sony isn't running that particular campaign in the US. They may have felt it was more likely to be misinterpreted here. So I'm not sure I can condemn them as insensitive just because we Americans are so particularly prone to get our hackles up over things like this. It would sort of be like getting offended that a billboard in Japan is in Japanese, and I can't understand it.

It's just skin. Different colors, sure. And Sony has stated that their goal behind the advertisement was to focus on the contrasting colors (two (http://pspupdates.qj.net/uploads/articles_module/57882/pic-3.jpg) other (http://pspupdates.qj.net/uploads/articles_module/57882/pic-1.jpg) images from the campaign). So in that regard, using colors, what's the big deal about using a person with black skin and a person with white skin? It's just color.

It would be nice if we lived in a world where anyone looked at that billboard and all they saw was two people.

But, in America especially, you look at that billboard, and you see a white person in an assumed position of dominance over a black person, and immediately alarms go off in your head. Everything we learned in history class about the 1800's comes flooding into our minds, along with a healthy dose of guilt, and we apply our own demons to the image. We attach 150 years of racial tension to the image, and condemn it for our history, not because of any message it's actually delivering.

Which really is just two people representing two handheld video game consoles.

Anyway, it's a little known fact that just a few weeks prior to this ad being released, Nintendo had a very similar ad in the very same spot. I'm lucky enough to posess a photograph of the billboard, which I'll share with you, my faithful readers.
http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/images/news/ds_ad.jpg

Source: CAD News

It's just skin. Different colors, sure. And Sony has stated that their goal behind the advertisement was to focus on the contrasting colors (two (http://pspupdates.qj.net/uploads/articles_module/57882/pic-3.jpg) other (http://pspupdates.qj.net/uploads/articles_module/57882/pic-1.jpg) images from the campaign). So in that regard, using colors, what's the big deal about using a person with black skin and a person with white skin? It's just color.

It would be nice if we lived in a world where anyone looked at that billboard and all they saw was two people.

But, in America especially, you look at that billboard, and you see a white person in an assumed position of dominance over a black person, and immediately alarms go off in your head. Everything we learned in history class about the 1800's comes flooding into our minds, along with a healthy dose of guilt, and we apply our own demons to the image. We attach 150 years of racial tension to the image, and condemn it for our history, not because of any message it's actually delivering.


I can't agree more...

I found this on the ZV boards this morning and it really got me to think. Is america so a ingnorant and selflish of a country that we cant look past a simple advertise flaw that sony put out. I mean I agree with what my friend is saying hre that it wasent a smart idea for them to do that. But come on now you can plany tell that its PSP coming to white advertisment not the advertisement of slavry.

Blitz Mage
04-08-06, 05:21
Several things.

First of all, this is actually about a month old and most of us here have probably already seen it. No big deal, but just to let you know.

Second, check your spelling and grammar.

Third, what on God's green Earth are you talking about? As best as I can remember, a grand total of one NAACP leader condemned the ad and not a single American 24/7 news station even mentioned the matter. Complaining about US culture going off the hook is a fairly stupid comment, as even Tim Buckley merely mentioned the ad campaign to point out the differences between American and European perceptions of the ad based on our very different racial histories. America is a very black/white concious culture because of the deep ethnic divisions that rocked our nation from practically the Revolution up till the 1970's, the side-effects of which are still felt to this day. Complaining about how Americans react to an ad when almost no Americans reacted to said ad beyond simply saying "WTF?" makes no sense and goes far beyond anything that Buckley mentioned when he first posted the image on CAD a while back.

In other words, just because a few people sound offended on the interweb or if it sparked a ripe discussion on the CAD forums, it doesn't mean that the ad formed widespread panic through the streets and brought back haunting images of slavery into American culture. It was simply a non-issue that Buckley himself took out of hand.

Would the ad have been made in the US? No, but does that mean that the US is a backwords, ignorant country just because of that? Again, that's a no. There are countless examples of ads that would be culterally appropriate in the United States and practically unthinkable in Europe, and vice versa, so it's fairly pointless to single this one out in an attempt to prove a point.